"Why does antisemitism appeal to me?" This seems like a strange question. I read a variation of it in a book I just finished called The Last Train: A Family History of the Final Solution by Peter Bradley. The author discovered by chance that his father, grandparents, and many other relatives had suffered under the Nazi regime because they were Jewish. Bradley’s father managed to escape the death camps; his grandparents and other relatives did not.
Toward the
end of the book, Bradley reflected on antisemitism. It has been around forever.
Racism has also been around forever. One of the topics he discusses is the idea
of infection; that good people can be antisemitic and racist sometimes without
even knowing about it. An example he gave was George Orwell, who recognized he
was infected and set about trying to change his way of thinking. He asked
himself, “Why does antisemitism appeal to me?” I think that was an excellent question.
It allows one to dig deep without placing blame on society or politicians or
parents or whomever.
I grew up in
the turbulent 60s. I was 10 when President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Bill
into law. I didn’t know about it. I didn’t see it on TV nor did I hear it. I
think I was insulated because my parents were Deaf. You might say it was a
blessing in disguise. They didn’t watch the news because they couldn’t
understand the newscasters. They read the newspaper every day but never
discussed any of the stories with my brother or me. We didn’t understand sign
language then and so we couldn’t follow any discussions they may have had.
I had my
first inkling that my parents were, at the very least, prejudiced when I came
downstairs on April 5, 1968, and turned on the TV to catch the morning news. In
social studies, we’d just begun to be assigned to listen to some of the morning
news. The anchors were reporting that Martin Luther King had been assassinated.
I wondered
who that was. I went in and lip-read the news to my parents. Their first
reaction startled me. They were delighted. They told me that he was a troublemaker.
I wondered if this Martin Luther King was some kind of criminal. My parents’ mood
changed, and they began to warn me there would be trouble from the Black
people. But they didn’t say Black. They used a sign that I recognized would
translate to the “n” word.
Of course, I
later learned that Martin Luther King was no criminal. He was a civil rights
activist and he’d been assassinated by a white man threatened by the idea that
white supremacy was being threatened. Now I saw early clips of dogs being set
on protesters by white cops. I saw young men being beaten with clubs. I
was confused. My parents thought the people being beaten up were troublemakers.
But they weren’t doing anything wrong when they were attacked.
When I
started high school in 1970, I was going to have to take 2 city buses every day
into downtown Baltimore. Mom told me that I should make friends with Black
students so that I would be protected “in case” there was trouble. I felt
disgusted. I’d had Black friends the last couple of years, and I didn’t feel
threatened in the least.
We used to
belong to a swim club. It was all white and there came a time when Black people
began to picket. They wanted to be able to join the club too. My parents were
up in arms about it. They didn’t want Black people to become members. I asked why
and was given the stupidest reason I ever heard: they would pee in the pool.
As I got
older, I began to understand more of the signs my parents used. I learned that
they were not only prejudiced about Black people, but they were also bigoted
about Jewish people, Puerto Ricans, and other Latin groups. When I asked why
all they could offer were more stupid reasons to dislike non-whites.
My parents suffered
discrimination. People made fun of them for their guttural speech. They were
called “dummies” or “deaf and dumb”. They didn’t have equal job or educational
opportunities. Sign language was denigrated as a lazy backward way of
communication. I couldn’t understand how they could reject people of color and
different religions when they, themselves, were rejected by most hearing people.
When I asked, they didn’t seem to get the comparison and were highly insulted.
As a teenager,
I only saw the fault in their prejudices and bigotry. I fought with them about
the stereotypes they believed in so strongly. They were woefully ignorant, I
thought, and unwilling to change. They never did change their views and would say,
“We are what we are.” It doesn’t matter anyway. They are gone and the question
isn’t why racism and antisemitism were appealing to them.
Is it
appealing to me? No. I don’t get any benefit from believing I’m better than
anyone else because I know it’s not true. We’re different colors depending on
where in the world we are from. We have different religions, so many, that one
can’t supersede others although Christians like to think theirs reigns supreme.
We have different cultures. All are valuable and we can learn from each other.
I wish we
could have respect for each other and get along. We’re all human, after all.
But that’s wishful thinking as even now antisemitism is on the rise and African
American males continue to be murdered by policemen for no good reasons. It
seemed like we were moving in a better direction over the last sixty years but
now we are taking too many steps backward, thanks to christian nationalism,
white supremacy, and tRumpism. We should
be facing our history honestly instead of continuing to hide from it and cover
it up.
It'll all
come down to a choice. Who do we want to be?
This is what I wrote about the book on Goodreads:
Like most curious children who come upon closed trunks, Peter Bradley opened his father’s to look inside. It was a shock to learn that his father wasn’t born Fred Bradley; he’d been born Fritz Brandes. What other secrets were there? Bradley didn’t discover them until after his father died and the need to know grew.
Fred Bradley didn’t speak much of his experiences in a Nazi concentration camp, his escape to England, and the disappearance of his parents. Peter Bradley was able to interview survivors who’d known his grandparents and father. In addition, there were documents that helped him trace the torturous journey of his grandparents from Germany to their final resting place. He tried to follow the route the train took which carried his grandparents and other relatives away.
I’ve read other books about the Holocaust, several by survivors like Elie Wiesel. The detailed brutality and inhumane treatment at the hands of Nazi oppressors made me sick. I thought this book was a little easier to read because Bradley was a generation removed and not a direct victim. He began the book with a history of antisemitism. He explained he might not have written the story but for the fact that he sees similarities to early 1930s Germany reappearing.
It's not an easy read but, for me, a necessary one.
No comments:
Post a Comment